Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 24 Next Page
Page Background www.acpa.org

Quarter 3, 2016

9

n e w s t a n t o n i n t e r c h a n g e

Stringless paving technology was selected for the

roundabout because it required less labor, less

time and produced a smoother paving surface.

Jointing represented the greatest challenge, ad-

mits Sciullo. “The approach and exit legs to the

roundabout are odd angles, which don’t work

well with concrete,” he says. “Pre-planning of

the joints was critical to make sure all the joints

were carefully laid out to the proper alignment

and distance,” he says. CAD [computer-aided

drafting] software was used to develop a joint

plan that worked. “We also isolated the circular

roundabout with an expansion collar so it did

not affect the joints of the approach and exit

legs,” he adds.

According to John M. Becker, P.E., President

of the Pennsylvania Chapter of the American

Concrete Pavement Association, construction

of concrete roundabouts in future projects will

be a bit simpler. “PennDOT central office will

be issuing new standard drawings on jointing

details for concrete roundabouts later this year,”

he says. “This will make concrete pavement

a viable alternative for engineers to consider

when designing roundabouts all across the

Commonwealth.”

Sciullo points out that even though they’ve gone

through the process for the first roundabout, each

of the remaining roundabouts in the project is

different. “One is circular but larger than the first

roundabout, and the other is a teardrop shape

so each requires its own joint plan.”

Tining the roundabout was also a change from

PennDOT’s standard, says Sciullo. “Transverse

tining is our standard but that doesn’t work in

a circle, so we used a stiff broom finish, which

is also better aesthetically.”

One of the lessons learned in the project is that

paving a roundabout in concrete is not too

much different than paving in asphalt, says

Sciullo. “In fact, asphalt takes more time be-

cause concrete is placed in one lift,” he says. The

main difference is the pre-planning for joints,

setting up the machine and training the crew

on the minor differences in technique. He adds,

“Actually, once we finished the pre-planning

and testing, the paving was the easiest part of

the job!”

» continued from page 7