Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  22 / 30 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 30 Next Page
Page Background

24 

PENNSYLVANIA

RESTAURANT & LODGING

matters

Spring 2017

LEGAL

DOCKET

The Attorney

ask

Recent Developments in

Wage Equity Legislation

Erin R. Kawa, Esquire

SHUMAKER WILLIAMS, P.C.

General Counsel,

Pennsylvania Restaurant & Lodging Association

Erin R. Kawa

ON JANUARY 23, 2017,

Philadelphia

Mayor Jim Kenney signed into law

Bill No. 160840

, which amends the

Philadelphia Fair Practices Ordinance and

prohibits employers from inquiring about

prospective employees’ salary histories.

Following on the heels of the passage

of similar legislation in Massachusetts—

which became the first state to prohibit

employers from requiring employees to

disclose wage history as a condition of

employment—

Bill No. 160840

passed with

unanimous approval by the Philadelphia

City Council. This ordinance is the first of its

kind in a United States city; however, similar

legislation has been introduced in New York

City and at the state level in Pennsylvania

and New Jersey.

The amended ordinance makes it unlawful

for an employer, employment agency, or an

agent thereof to:

• Inquire about an applicant’s wage

history or require disclosure of an

applicant’s wage history;

• Condition employment, or consideration

for employment, on disclosure of wage

history;

• Rely on the wage history of an applicant

in determining that individuals at any

stage of the employment process,

unless the applicant knowingly and

willingly disclosed his or her wage

history to the employer; or

• Retaliate against an applicant for failing

to comply with an inquiry regarding

wage history or opposing an employer’s

alleged violation of the Ordinance.

“Employer” is broadly defined to include

entities that do business in Philadelphia,

and likely will apply to employers that hire

employees to physically or remotely work

at a location within the city. The ordinance

allows for enforcement by the Philadelphia

Human Relations Commission and a

private cause of action, with remedies

and penalties including compensatory

damages, punitive damages, injunctive

relief, attorney’s fees, and costs.

The objective of the ordinance is to

promote wage equity by curbing

discrimination in the hiring process.

Specifically, the original bill cites a 2015

U.S. Census Bureau report that found

that women in Pennsylvania earn 79

cents for every dollar a man makes, with

women of color typically earning even

less. Accordingly, the City Council found

that inquiring about wage history can

perpetuate that existing gap because

prior wages would serve as the basis for

setting the compensation for the current

position. Proponents of the bill argue that

the responsibilities of a position should

determine the appropriate compensation—

not the prior wages earned by an applicant.

The passage of the ordinance was not

without controversy, and its viability has

been called into question by members

of the business community and the

Pennsylvania Legislature. For example,

Comcast threatened to sue Philadelphia

for a purported violation of employers’ First

Amendment rights, claiming that there is

no evidence to suggest that inquiring about

wage history perpetuates discrimination,

and therefore Philadelphia cannot justify

curtailing employers’ rights to ask. The

Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce has

echoed Comcast’s concerns regarding

evidentiary support, and argues that

preventing employers from questioning

applicants about wage history will prevent

job growth and business expansion.

Philadelphia Becomes the First U.S. City to Ban

Employers from Inquiring About Wage History