OTLA Trial Lawyer Fall 2024

The defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing the plaintiff’s claim was not timely filed. The plaintiff argued her claim was filed within the statute of limitations because (1) the claim was filed within the 90 day “sunset” period provided in the covid relief statute, HB 4212, and (2) the claim was filed within two years of the exploratory surgery, which was the date the plaintiff discovered the “substantial damage” she sustained from the collision. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion. “The Court of Appeals affirmed, explaining that a vehicle is furnished for regular use if the insured can use it when the insured wants to, even if the vehicle is not totally under the insured’s control and is not available for both personal and business use.” See Between the Sheets p. 54 53 Trial Lawyer | Fall 2024

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Nzc3ODM=