Fal l 2022 www.nvda.org 13 Section Header unlicensed, inadequately tested, emergency use authorized genetic vaccines,” Malone said. Earlier this year Jessica Rose Ph.D. co-authored a VAERS analysis that was withdrawn by the academic journal Elsevier. She told The Epoch Times that Thorp’s analysis aligns perfectly with hers. “I do believe it is not only important, but necessary, to pull these products from pregnant/breastfeeding women and infants since there is no longterm safety data and the short-term data looks bad. As per both Moderna and Pfizer’s safety documents presented to VRBPAC pre-EUA granting for 0- 4-year-olds, this applies. They both showed terrible risk,” Rose said. Christiane Northrup, MD, a fellow of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, also stands by the analysis. “Having been on the front lines of the diethyl stilbesterol (DES) disaster as a young OB/GYN, I am astounded that we are repeating the same kind of mistake, but on a far more devastating level. COVID-19 shots must be stopped immediately in all pregnant women before further damage is done to the next generation,” Northrup told The Epoch Times. Thorp continued: “All of these adverse outcomes are statistically significant (p value < 0.0001)–in other words, the probability of these adverse outcomes occurring by chance alone is less than 1 in 10,000. It was incumbent upon the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers, FDA, CDC, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Society for MaternalFetal Medicine, and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology to have demanded this safety data prior to pushing these dangerous ‘vaccines’ in pregnancy.” “These institutions have violated the golden rule of pregnancy: new substances be it nutraceuticals, drugs, or vaccines have NEVER been allowed in pregnancy until long-term outcome data are available. Now, the COVID-19 vaccines make prior obstetrical disasters of DES and thalidomide look like prenatal vitamins. I am calling for a worldwide ban and moratorium on the use of any experimental gene therapy and/or COVID19 ‘vaccines’ in pregnancy until long-term safety data are irrefutable,” Thorp stated. According to OpenVAERS, “VAERS was put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% of vaccine injuries.” The VAERS official disclaimer, however, states: “While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.” 0 1 (Editor’s Note: The NDAJ asked previously how the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and other related organizations, could reasonably opine that the COVID vaccines, actually experimental formulations save the Federal Government/CDC changing the definition of “vaccine” in September 2021, were safe for pregnant mothers and their babies before any of the babies had even been born.)1 References Plos One, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal. pone.0263025, accessed 10 AUG 2022. Featured Article
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTY1NDIzOQ==