ACPA Concrete Pavement Progress Quarter 3 2020

Concrete Pavement Progress www.acpa.org A C P A N E W S 28 PEM Meeting Provides Good Repor t on Progress A RECENT INDUSTRY MEETING OFFERED SOME INSIGHTS into progress on the pooled fund research and development project on Performance Engineered Mixtures (PEM). ACPA President & CEO Jerry Voigt represented ACPA and the concrete pavement industry at the national level. Peter Taylor, Ph.D., P.E., Director of the CP Tech Center, led the discussion and says, “The work has been ongoing, despite delays and some changes related travel and meeting limitations brought about by coronavirus stay-at-home orders.” “There is a lot of interest and activity,” Taylor says, adding, “PEM is getting traction beyond this project. Some states are picking up the ideas and carrying out their own initiatives.” Mike Praul, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), presented an update on FHWA’s efforts aimed at developing a comprehensive quality control (QC) plan and related control chart tools. The purpose of this effort is to show states and contractors how to imple- ment and execute a more effective performance-related quality program, he says. The effort also will help smaller contractors move to a more robust QC process. He adds the draft QC materials will be made available in the fall for conceptual feedback/review by ACPA and others in the PEM industry group. He also announced some news about the FHWA’s Mobile Concrete Tech- nology Center (MCTC), the rolling laboratory that ACPA contractors and DOTs have benefited from for many years. “The mobile concrete technol- ogy center is grounded for the rest of this calendar year,” Praul says, “but we [FHWA] are pursuing technician-level video training for contractors using the tests we ordinarily demo with the trailer.” FHWA will continue developing new videos over the next six to eight months. The video train- ing is aimed at teaching technicians how to perform tests, not why they are important, Praul says. Development updates were provided by the research team members on all related PEM tests, including resistivity, super air meter, a phoenix test (a new test for water-cement ratio in fresh concrete). Tom Van Dam, Ph.D., P.E., NCE (an ACPA member), reported on efforts to log the data generated on state trials into a database. “The purpose is to ensure that we do not lose the data generated and allow for continued cross-learning, as well as providing opportunities to perform historic learning and forensic evaluation of projects in the future,” he says. The committee discussed the idea of doing regional meetings with states and industry to discuss where we go next with PEM in each region. This approach will allow the team to learnmore about the specification changes states are adopting or at least to know which ones are on the states’ radar. The regional discussions will start in the next quarter and will be part of ensuring further progress on PEM implementation. Taylor says the progress to date shows the PEM initiative is on target. “The focus so far has been on the ‘M’ of PEM. But PEM is about more than add- ing a test or two to the specifications,” he says. “When we started this a lot of states did not know exactly what they wanted, but now some states are moving to performance specifications. States are working through a process of defining where they want to implement all that PEMhas to offer.” Voigt encouraged the group to “keep plugging away and to give yourselves more credit regarding the progress made to date. You are probably farther ahead than you think you are at this point in the process.” He adds, “While COVID may be delaying field demonstrations a bit, it does not appear to be hampering the effort/progress to the overall goal.” A technician prepares concrete for Super Air Meter testing, one of several testing protocols that is key to successful implementation of PEM. (Photo: ACPA staff.) “The focus so far has been on the ‘M’ of PEM. But PEM is about more than adding a test or two to the specifications. When we started this a lot of states did not know exactly what they wanted, but now some states are moving to performance specifications. States are working through a process of defining where they want to implement all that PEM has to offer.” – Peter Taylor, Ph.D., P.E., Director of the CP Tech Center